Alle 16,37 del 12 dicembre 1969 si compie a Milano la strage di piazza Fontana. Una bomba di sette pounds of TNT exploded at the headquarters of the National Bank for Agriculture. It 's a tragedy: the death toll at 16, wounded 88. A few minutes later, three more bombs explode in Rome: the first at the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro with 13 wounded, the second and the third between the Altare della Patria and Palazzo Venezia with four wounded. Another unexploded bomb was found, again in Milan at the Italian Commercial Bank and is shone immediately, perhaps to eliminate a possible test. The fatal day marks the beginning of terrorism, the years of lead, the darkest period of postwar Italian history. And 'the strategy of tension, that succession of bloody massacres and terrorist attacks Italy in the 70s. But who are the makers of those bombs? About the principals? As a strategist, Italian or foreign, found it useful or necessary to bring the nation to the brink of the abyss? And for what purpose? Even today, after nearly forty years and seven processes, do not even know the perpetrators of this assassination. They were at the bar anarchists and neo-fascist secret service men, but justice has not found guilty. The only ones to be condemned, believe it or not, are the relatives of the victims, after all, that's incredible!, Statti are forced by the courts to pay even the costs processuali.Ci were many theorems. He also talked about the massacre in the state. But what is the truth, one made of first and last names and number of tests and decisive? The'll never know? Prodest of which may perhaps come to our aid, but only for a disquisition of indicative and not exhaustive. Who has thus helped the strategy of tension? The Italian economic power to impose an authoritarian turn right and counter the drift, growing and increasingly uncontrollable after '68, the claims of workers supported by the left? Political power in the hands of Italian DC, which brought terror dall'eversione right and left, the opposite extremes, and draws lifeblood is the healthier part of national policy and therefore the only appointed to govern the country? At MSI, which takes advantage of the fear of disorder terroristico, attribuito alla sinistra, per farsi paladino della parola “ordine”, incrementare i consensi e costringere la DC a toglierlo dall’isolamento istituzionale e portarlo al governo? Al PCI che, nella statica situazione dei due blocchi internazionali, non ha spazio per una conquista democratica del potere in Italia e pensa di poterci arrivare solo perseguendo la strada della destabilizzazione politica e istituzionale? Agli USA, che intendono mantenere con la DC l’egemonia economica e politica in Italia e, mediante la CIA e i servizi segreti italiani, finanzia sia l’estremismo di destra che di sinistra per alimentare gli opposti estremismi?All’URSS, che si appresta ad invadere l’Europa libera e, alimentando KGB with terrorism, it tends to disrupt and weaken the institutions of Western countries, including Italy? Of questions he might ask another hundred. And I am sure that everyone would be ready to give an answer, an interpretation as to its mindset, experience and knowledge, the appropriateness of parte.Domando: not yet ripe time to remove, not only in our house, the many state secrets, to open the hidden files and try to make clear now, if it is still possible, on this and other blood-stained pages of our recent history?
